draft disclosure when teaching old universe curriculum.
1) science limited by ability to observe and test.
2) random evolution from less to more complex life forms:
a) should not even qualify as science theory
b) and as close to zero probability as one can get.
c) common sense would deem impossible.
3) By limiting possible scenarios to that of old universe:
a) are precluding the scenario most consistent with factual science and valid logic.
b) are in violation of consistent application 'Lemon' test of secular purpose, as underlying reason/resulting effect is to promote secular humanism to the exclusion of other denominations.
c) is bad science
d) is a waste of time
e) is a waste of taxpayer money.
f) basing isotope dating and cross calibrated dating methods on the faulty logic of circular reasoning. Lack of isotopes as old universe - old universe so lack of isotopes.
g) ignores most likely scenario lack of isotopes due to radiation build began either 5768 years ago based on known time line or post flood start 4112 years ago.
h) ignores evidence complex language with us from first human.
i) ignores evidence of sudden appearance of diverse complex life forms
j) discriminates against minority world views and some religious denominations.
h) has led to racism and murder based on implied opening for racial superiority. in fact we are from one common ancestor Adam.
i) has led to mass slaughter by implied opening humans just evolved animals. In fact we each have a special soul.
j) in violation of establishment clause as Secular Humanism has been deemed a religion by courts.
4) not good presumption to assume steady rate of mutations or constant atmospheric conditions:
a) inbreeding over time will slow rate of potential diversity.
b) obvious separation of single continent /ocean, change in shape of earth, change in axis and orbit will effect atmosphere.
c) changes in heat and pressure can totally change time a process takes.
5) speed of light not fixed or speed limit
a) most old research based on erroneous presumption that it was.
b) once accept premise speed light not fixed as in inflation theory universe 6 thousand, million or billion, years old all feasible.
6) Irreducible complexity
a) if random evolution happened, should be abundance of past and happening evidence, yet no proven evidence.
b) would conflict with survival of fittest as until useless trait functional would be handicap.
c) Attests to intelligent design.
7) Entropic principal
a) takes energy to organize
b) left alone things tend to break down
c) things that don't break down attest to very intelligent design
d) Like a baby in the womb we are in a sweet spot with just the right conditions to sustain our lives.
8) Culture preventing scientists, scientific journals, from considering the truth
a) risk career, funding, black list, ridicule
b) self centered, self electing, academy of scientists
c) funding unavailable for research confirming new universe, Creator.
d) fear of responsibility, accountability, that comes with recognizing Creator.
e) desensitized to truth as we have been indoctrinated with big lie of old universe for so long.
9) Appearance of random operating system not necessarily random.
10) Old universe lemmings select from limited evidence that is consistent with views, not giving due consideration to evidence that contradicts.
11) improper use of religious establishment clause to avoid debate of facts.
12) Facts expose proponents limiting consideration to old universe/evolution are expert fools.
13) Any legit origins theory of physical universe must still account for appearance of initial primordial matter.
14) Life sustaining universe/earth millions of years old takes more faith and perhaps greater miracle then most credible and scientifically sound 7 day creation from nothing 5768 years ago account.